Giuliani balked at prosecutors’ review of 26 years of data

0
14

Court papers show Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers forced a much narrower review of his seized electronic devices after learning they contained data from as far back as his early days as New York City’s mayor

NEW YORK — Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers forced a much narrower review of his seized electronic devices after complaining that prosecutors looking for proof of a crime were going to see information going back to his early days as New York City’s mayor 26 years ago, court papers released Tuesday show.

The lawyers said the review of data on the devices should be limited to the time period specified in search warrants seeking information related to Giuliani’s interactions with Ukrainian figures to see if he violated a law governing lobbying on behalf of foreign countries or entities.

The papers related to whether the search of data should be narrowed were unsealed Tuesday by the order of a judge who concluded they were documents the public was entitled to see.

Giuliani’s lawyers said that prosecutors “to the government’s credit” eventually agreed that they did not need to see documents and other materials created prior to 2018.

Two weeks ago, Manhattan Judge J. Paul Oetken ordered that an ongoing review to exclude from prosecutors’ eyes any materials that are protected by privileges such as attorney-client privilege be limited to documents dated on or after Jan. 1, 2018.

The materials are on 18 electronic devices seized from Giuliani’s residence and his firm, Giuliani Partners LLC. Some of the devices belong to employees of the law firm.

The privilege review is being carried out by a former Manhattan federal judge who Oetken appointed to the task at the request of prosecutors. A similar review was conducted after raids on Michael Cohen, who served as Trump’s personal lawyer before his 2018 arrest.

He eventually pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including campaign finance crimes, lying to Congress and tax evasion and was sentenced to three years in prison. After serving about a year behind bars, he was freed to home detention after the coronavirus hit.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments